Dating the gospel of john
The Gospels, the first four books of the New Testament, tell the story of the life of Jesus.
Yet only one—the Gospel of John—claims to be an eyewitness account, the testimony of the unnamed “disciple whom Jesus loved.” (“This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and wrote these things, and we know that his testimony is true” [John ]). ” is a question that remains unanswered, though noted theologians throughout the ages maintain that it was indeed the disciple John who penned the famous Biblical book.
The geographic specificity lends credence to the John’s account.
Another aspect of John that may be more historically accurate than the Synoptics is the account of the crucifixion and the events that led up to it.
We may never know for certain who wrote the Gospel of John, any more than we can know who wrote the books of Matthew, Mark and Luke. Early Matthew, Mark and Luke are so alike in their telling that they are called the Synoptic Gospels, meaning “seen together”—the parallels are clear when they are looked at side by side.
Matthew and Luke follow the version of events in Mark, which is thought by scholars to be the earliest and most historically accurate Gospel.
, prominent Biblical scholars Leonard Greenspoon and Harvey Minkoff expertly guide you through 21 different Bible translations (or versions) and address their content, text, style and religious orientation.
One of the facts in dispute among the four Gospels is the length of Jesus’ ministry.
The Jesus of John’s telling also knew Jerusalem well and had traveled there three or four times.In John’s account Jesus becomes the Passover sacrificial lamb, which was offered the afternoon before the Passover holiday.Some scholars suggest that John may be more historical regarding the crucifixion than the other three Gospels.This would mean that the person who wrote the Gospel of John would not have been a contemporary of Jesus, and therefore would not have been an eyewitness as the author claims.There is also the possibility that the author of John did not know of Mark and hence did not have the same information.
The Synoptics, however, have Jesus visit Jerusalem only once.